Claude Diagnostic · Fundraising Unlocked
WHY WOULD
AN INVESTOR
SAY NO
TO YOU?

I built a 10,000-word Claude prompt that scores your fundraise readiness out of 100. It's based on everything I've learned coaching 120+ founders through $250M+ in raises. See how 5 real founders scored, then do it yourself.

120+
Founders coached
$250M+
Raised collectively
10K+
Word prompt
Please fill in all fields with a valid email.

By submitting you agree to our Terms of Use. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

5 FOUNDERS.
BEFORE & AFTER.

These are real founders I've coached. Anonymised, but the scores are real. Every one of them went from the red to the green, and every one of them closed their round.

Founder A · First-Time Founder
Health Tech · $3.15M Seed
CLOSED, $3.15M
Before
Narrative
52
Network
18
Process
15
After
Narrative
84
Network
88
Process
86
Overall Score
29 86 +57

Was getting vague rejections like "too early" even though the business was ready. The business didn't change, the narrative, network, and process did. Mapped 150+ investors, activated 100+ warm intros, and manufactured real competition.

Founder B · First-Time Founder · 2 Companies
Enterprise SaaS · $4M Seed
CLOSED, $4M
Before
Narrative
45
Network
22
Process
12
After
Narrative
81
Network
82
Process
87
Overall Score
26 83 +57

First-time founder raising for two companies simultaneously. Story was scattered, network was nonexistent. Built a disciplined pipeline that created enough momentum for a $3M preemptive offer he never asked for.

Founder C · Experienced Founder
Consumer Tech · £4M Seed
CLOSED, £4M
Before
Narrative
61
Network
48
Process
28
After
Narrative
85
Network
83
Process
88
Overall Score
46 85 +39

Had raised before, and still called this a game changer. Experience doesn't equal good process. Previous rounds dragged for months. This time: week-by-week plan, compressed timeline, clear deadline.

Founder D · Technical Founder
AI / Health · £1.7M Seed
CLOSED, £1.7M
Before
Narrative
55
Network
25
Process
20
After
Narrative
82
Network
81
Process
84
Overall Score
33 82 +49

Pitched like a researcher, not a founder. First raise was chaotic and felt like luck. Second raise: 70+ investors mapped by thesis fit, structured process with clear stages. Night and day.

Founder E · Hardware / Deep Tech
Hardware · €4.5M Seed
CLOSED, €4.5M
Before
Narrative
38
Network
30
Process
25
After
Narrative
84
Network
80
Process
81
Overall Score
31 82 +51

Every VC automatically said no to hardware. Reframed the stigma as a competitive moat, "hardware complexity is what keeps competitors out." Expanded network to hardware-friendly funds. Closed despite the bias.

AVG BEFORE: 33
AVG AFTER: 84

4 out of 5 started below 35. All 5 finished above 82. All 5 closed their rounds. The weakest pillar was always Network or Process, never Narrative. Founders overinvest in their pitch and underinvest in the two things that actually close rounds.

Founder Sector Round Before After Change
Founder AHealth Tech$3.15M2986+57
Founder BEnterprise SaaS$4M2683+57
Founder CConsumer Tech£4M4685+39
Founder DAI / Health£1.7M3382+49
Founder EHardware€4.5M3182+51
SCORE
YOURSELF

I turned everything I've learned from 120+ raises into a single Claude prompt. It asks you 15 questions, the same ones I ask in my first session with every founder, and tells you exactly where an investor would say no.

The prompt scores you across Narrative (35%), Network (35%), and Process (30%). Most founders score 35-65 on their first try. You need to be in the 80s to have a real shot at closing. Here's how to use it:

  1. 1
    Copy the prompt below (or download the file)
  2. 2
    Paste it into Claude (claude.ai, free to use)
  3. 3
    Answer the 15 questions as honestly as possible. Vague answers = vague scores.
  4. 4
    Get your score report, overall score, per-pillar breakdown, your biggest bottleneck, and exactly what to fix.
Download .md File
Copied! Now paste it into Claude.